Juventus has been closely monitoring Sandro Tonali for quite some time, especially as the midfielder continues to impress in the Premier League with Newcastle United. His abilities were already clear when he played for AC Milan in Serie A, but at that time, it would have been difficult for Juventus to secure his signature. AC Milan would have preferred to sell Tonali to a club abroad, making it challenging for Juventus to bring him to Turin. Now that he is playing outside of Italy, it may be easier for Juventus to negotiate a deal.
Despite this, Juventus remains vigilant in tracking Tonali’s progress, although signing a player from Newcastle United is never straightforward. The Premier League club is known for being particularly reluctant to sell key players, which adds another layer of difficulty to any potential move. However, Juventus still hopes they can convince Newcastle to part with the talented midfielder.
So why is Juventus so keen on Tonali? Naturally, his talent alone makes him an attractive prospect for the club. Tonali has proven himself to be a skilled and reliable midfielder, and his performances in the Premier League only bolster his reputation. However, there is another key factor behind Juventus’ interest, which Tuttojuve has revealed: the club is eager to increase the number of Italian players in their squad.

Currently, Juventus boasts a large number of foreign stars from various countries and continents, and the club is keen to bring in more Italian talent. This is one of the main reasons Tonali appeals to Juventus, as his presence would contribute to a more Italian-centric squad. Juventus has always had a rich tradition of Italian players, and the club is eager to return to that philosophy, balancing its international stars with a stronger Italian presence.
While Tonali’s potential addition would be a significant boost for Juventus, it’s important to note that securing his services would not come cheap. The cost of signing a player of his calibre, especially from a club like Newcastle United, would be substantial.
4 Comments
So then why did we ship out fagioli and rovella? And are currently looking to sell cambiasso? We also had the chance to sign scamacca instead of Vlahovic. He was producing in serie A at the time and I think would have continued to do so. At worse he was worth half as much as we spent on DV. That would have financially allowed us to have other options at striker beyond the often injured milik. Now that I think about it – also kean (to be fair I was glad to see him go, he just could not produce playing at Juve and I don’t think that would have changed this term)
And Kean, and Caviglia etc
I forgot cavigli. Who I really liked and was very disappointed we let go. Defensively he’s a liability but passing wise especially off of corners he was good. And he seemed to be quite composed as a young man.
I think the management didn’t believe in Fagioli and Rovella. They want world-class Italian players, not Italian players. Maybe they were wrong. But Kean couldn’t score a single miserable goal last year, I would have sold him too.
I will be very curious to see Cambiaso’s performance, if he can play in the remaining few games, because he’s been mostly injured in recent months, and in the few games he played, he could have been replaced by anyone.
Comments are closed